Cette section n'existe pas encore en français — le contenu ci-dessous est en anglais. La traduction arrive.
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic's mid-tier model, now close enough to Opus on real work that it's the default choice for almost everything.
Quality
Modality
multimodal
Context
1M tokens
Access
closed
Fabian's Take
"I've been running Sonnet 5 against Opus 4.8 on real tasks this week, and it's closer than any Sonnet generation has been before. It's become agentic in a way earlier Sonnets weren't — it strings together more tool calls, sticks with harder problems longer, and rarely needs me to step in and redirect it. For most Claude work, this is the model to reach for by default."
Claude Sonnet 5 is the latest version of Anthropic’s mid-tier model, and it closes most of the gap that used to separate Sonnet from Opus. It’s not just faster and cheaper anymore — it’s meaningfully better at working through multi-step tasks on its own.
How it compares
Against Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5 gives up a little depth on the hardest, most ambiguous reasoning problems, but for coding, drafting, and everyday agentic work the two are close enough that Sonnet 5 is the more sensible default. It’s also a clear step up from Sonnet 4.6 in how it handles tools: it uses more of them, in longer sequences, and holds up over longer stretches of autonomous work without drifting off track.
The Verdict
Best for: Daily coding, drafting, and agentic work where you don't want to pay Opus prices.
Pros
- Handles long, tool-heavy agentic sessions without losing the thread
- Coding and refactoring quality closing in on Opus
- Still fast and cheap enough for real-time, everyday use
Cons
- Still a notch behind Opus on the hardest, most open-ended reasoning
Specs
- Pricing $3/M input, $15/M output
- Cost Tier moderate
- ⚡Speed Tier fast
- License Proprietary